Glaucon isn’t persuaded by the objections in the previous discussion (357a)
b. Guide II
The guy splits good things towards the around three classes: some thing a beneficial in themselves, anything a both in themselves and also for their outcomes, and you may anything a beneficial only for the outcomes (357b-d). Socrates metropolitan areas justice on group of something a beneficial in themselves as well as its consequences.
Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ conflict in order to issue Socrates to guard fairness by by itself for granted out-of what originates from they (358b ff.). Glaucon brings a speech defending injustice: (i) fairness starts since a damage between weak people who find themselves afraid that suffering injustice are worse than just doing it (358e-359a); (ii) anyone operate justly because this is expected and you can inevitable, therefore fairness is right just for the consequences (tale of your band away from Gyges’ predecessor, 359c-360d); (iii) this new unjust people on the history of fairness is happier than just new only individual into the history of injustice (360d-362c).
Adeimantus develops Glaucon’s protection of injustice and you may assault toward justice by asserting: the history of justice is better than justice alone, so the unfair person who might be able to support the character of being merely is pleased compared to just individual; dialogue of various ways in which the latest unfair can acquire brand new character for justice (362d-366d).
Socrates try asked to protect justice getting itself, perhaps not on profile it allows to own (367b).Daha fazlasını oku »Glaucon isn’t persuaded by the objections in the previous discussion (357a)