An alternative type rating the Stretched Individual Features Questionnaire (EPAQ) was used to evaluate the fresh new constructs out of negative and positive androgyny. The fresh EPAQ try administered in order to 196 adult people; its solutions was basically classified on the a classified androgyny. Significant differences was basically obtained anywhere between positive and negative androgynous somebody due to the fact better given that anywhere between positive and negative female and positive and negative male some body to the a collection of methods out-of emotional health insurance and well-being. These best gay hookup apps results support the validity and you will utility off identifying androgyny towards negative and positive types of sex character name.
References
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self-esteem since the a function of masculinity both in sexes. Log of Consulting and you can Clinical Psychology, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, Grams., Thompson, Letter. (1981). An enthusiastic Australian Sex Role Size. Australian Diary regarding Mindset, 33, 169-183.
Baril, Grams., Elbert, N., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, G. (1989). Is actually androgynous executives very more beneficial? Category and you will Organization Training, fourteen, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). Towards the electric of alternative steps to the determining off mental androgyny, Diary off Consulting and you can Medical Psychology, 45, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). The transgender paradigm shift into 100 % free phrase. For the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Sex blending (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Sex role differences in sensitivity toward dictate regarding support availability for the despair. Record out of Personality, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Welcome from the someone else and its particular reference to acceptance regarding mind and you can others: A beneficial revaluation. Record out-of Unpredictable and you can Social Mindset, 50, 274-276.
Environmentally friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). This new attractiveness of sex method of attributes at different relationships profile: Androgynous characteristics tends to be desirable after all. Diary out-of Identification and you will Social Mindset, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, A good. (1981a). Sex differences in the working linkage anywhere between androgyny, personal cognition, and you will skills. Record off Character and you may Public Psychology, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). Brief style of the new Colorado Social Choices Inventory, a target measure of notice-respect. Bulletin of one’s Psychometric Area, 4, 473-475.
Hoffman, R. (2001). New dimension out-of maleness and you will womanliness: Historical direction and you can implications for therapy. Log regarding Guidance and you will Invention, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The newest recognition and translation from communications effects anywhere between continuing details in the numerous regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, twenty-five, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, Yards., Hansson, Roentgen. (1978). The enigma off androgyny: Differential implications for males and you may women. Log out-of Asking and you may Systematic Psychology, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). Brand new preparations getting intercourse opportunities and you can androgyny: A critical remark. Diary out-of Systematic and Consulting Psychology, forty-five, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Intercourse spots and decision making when you look at the demographically varied communities: An incident to own reviving androgyny. Intercourse Opportunities, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The action and you can phrase away from fury. Matchmaking that have sex role socialization, anxiety and you will mental health doing work. Log of Asking Psychology, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, E. (1991). Gender spots: The latest dimensions regarding manliness, femininity, and you may androgyny. Inside J. Robinson, D. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Steps away from personality and you can public emotional attitudes (pp. 573-660). San diego, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A beneficial., Butcher, J. (1981). The partnership anywhere between androgyny and you can subjective indications away from psychological well-getting. Journal of Character and you may Social Psychology, forty, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An effective., Butcher, J. (1983). Maleness, womanliness and you may androgyny seen and you will reviewed since the line of maxims. Diary of Character and you can Public Psychology, 49, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its particular relation to adolescent emotional well-being: A review of the fresh books. Sex Roles, 21, 25-341.
Can get, Good., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you can dealing inside boys having an excellent managerial direction. Southern African Record of Mindset, 27, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, An effective. (1992). Kid’s sex typed thinking out of physical activity: Effects and you can ramifications. Perceptual and you will Engine Skills, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). This new Nowicki-Strickland Expected life Locus from Manage Bills: Build recognition. Into the H. Yards. Lefcourt (Ed.), Browse for the locus off handle create (Vol. dos, pp. 16-43). Nyc: Informative Press.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you may low-stereotypic gender part characteristic and you may choices orientations, sex label and you will psychological adjustment. Diary away from Identity and you may Public Therapy, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Intercourse and you can power. From inside the P. Meters. Kalbfleisch Meters. J. Cody (Eds.), Sex, stamina, and you will communication into the individual relationship (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Shaver, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Methods of character and public mental thinking. Hillcrest, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Rose, A good., Montemayor, R. (1994). The relationship between intercourse character orientation and thought of notice-competency in men and women teens. Gender Opportunities, 31, 579-595.
Russell, Grams., Antill, J. (1984). A keen Australian intercourse-character level: Most psychometric studies and you may correlations having thinking-admiration. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Meters. (1991). Violence, intercourse character strategies and you can Kohut’s therapy of your own mind. Gender Roles, twenty-five, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Social phenomenology given that a function of sexual direction, sex, sentiment, and you may feature categories in the overall dyadic relationship. Diary away from Identity and you will Public Therapy, 47, 983-1002.
Pick single article
Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, M., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you may attachment cover: A couple related varieties of optimum identity. Character and you will Social Therapy Bulletin, 22, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and successful adaptation over the life time certainly one of Japanese adults. Record regarding Hereditary Psychology, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Age. (1995). Intercourse character direction and its relationship to the introduction of term and ethical imagine. Scandinavian Diary from Psychology, thirty-six, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Maleness, femininity, and sex-related characteristics: A conceptual investigation and you will critique of most recent look. Progress from inside the Experimental Character Search, thirteen, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). Three decades off gender lookup: An individual chronicle. Into the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you may stereotypes from inside the society: Brand new gender technology from erican Psychological Organization.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Important and you may expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist thinking: Exactly what do it signify? Psychology of women Quarterly, twenty four, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Holahan, C. (1979). Bad and good areas of psychological maleness and you will womanliness as well as their relationship to mind-records away from neurotic and you will acting-out behaviors. Diary out of Character and you will Public Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The personal Characteristics Questionnaire: A measure of sex part stereotypes and you will maleness-femininity. JSAS Catalog out of Chosen Documents in the Mindset, 4, 43-forty two.
Share, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and you may instrumentality for the real life configurations: A new position on the benefits associated with androgyny. Intercourse Opportunities, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, Meters., Hall, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An assessment and you can reformulation of your own concepts, tips, and you can findings. Mental Bulletin, 92, 347-366.
Western, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Starting intercourse. Inside Yards. Kimmel (Ed.), Brand new gendered area viewer (pp. 131-149). Ny: Oxford School Force.
Whitley, B. (1983). Intercourse part direction and you may care about-esteem: A serious meta-analytic feedback, Journal away from Personality and Public Psychology, 44, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (inside push). Trendy and you will unwanted androgyny: A treatments towards the twenty-first millennium. Log out-of Intercourse Knowledge.
Wulff, Meters., Steitz, J. (1999). A route brand of the relationship ranging from career indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you can self-regard. Perceptual and you will Motor Knowledge, 88, 935-940.