A separate types of rating the Extended Individual Properties Survey (EPAQ) was used to assess this new constructs regarding positive and negative androgyny. The fresh EPAQ is given in order to 196 adult women and men; their answers was basically classified for the a differentiated androgyny. Extreme distinctions were received between negative and positive androgynous someone as the better while the ranging from negative and positive women and positive and negative male some body with the a couple of procedures off mental health and well-getting. These results support the authenticity and you will utility out of recognize androgyny towards negative and positive categories of gender part name.
Sources
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self esteem due to the fact a purpose of masculinity in both genders. Log out-of Asking and you will Clinical Mindset, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, N. (1981). An Australian Gender Part Size. Australian Log of Therapy, 33, 169-183.
Baril, G., Elbert, Letter., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Is actually androgynous executives really far better? Category and you may Organization Training, fourteen, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). Towards the utility regarding solution methods to your evaluating regarding mental androgyny, Log out of Consulting and Health-related Psychology, forty-five, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). The newest transgender paradigm change towards the free expression. From inside the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Gender blending (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Sex part variations in susceptibility to the influence away from assistance availability with cybermen promo code the depression. Journal out of Personality, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Welcome because of the other people and its relation to greeting off self and you will others: A great revaluation. Diary regarding Unusual and you will Personal Psychology, fifty, 274-276.
Green, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). New appeal of intercourse method of characteristics during the different matchmaking accounts: Androgynous attributes tends to be common after all. Record off Personality and you will Public Therapy, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, A beneficial. (1981a). Intercourse variations in the working linkage between androgyny, societal knowledge, and you will proficiency. Journal out of Personality and Societal Psychology, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). Short brand of the new Colorado Personal Behavior List, a goal measure of self-regard. Bulletin of the Psychometric Area, cuatro, 473-475.
Hoffman, R. (2001). Brand new dimension of masculinity and you will womanliness: Historic angle and you may ramifications to have guidance. Record from Therapy and Advancement, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The fresh recognition and you may translation regarding telecommunications outcomes between proceeded parameters when you look at the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Browse, twenty-five, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, Yards., Hansson, R. (1978). The latest enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and you may lady. Record off Consulting and you may Clinical Mindset, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The formulations having gender roles and you can androgyny: A life threatening opinion. Log away from Systematic and you will Consulting Therapy, forty five, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Sex spots and you will decision-making for the demographically varied groups: An instance to possess revitalizing androgyny. Intercourse Opportunities, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and you may expression of frustration. Relationships having intercourse role socialization, despair and you will psychological state working. Diary away from Consulting Therapy, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, Age. (1991). Gender opportunities: The newest measurement from manliness, femininity, and androgyny. Into the J. Robinson, D. Razor, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Methods away from identity and societal emotional thinking (pp. 573-660). San diego, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An excellent., Butcher, J. (1981). The partnership anywhere between androgyny and you can subjective indications regarding emotional better-becoming. Diary regarding Character and you will Public Mindset, 40, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., Butcher, J. (1983). Manliness, femininity and you may androgyny seen and you may analyzed while the type of axioms. Log away from Identification and you can Societal Psychology, 44, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its relation to adolescent psychological well-being: A look at the latest literary works. Sex Jobs, 21, 25-341.
Will get, A beneficial., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and dealing inside guys that have a managerial orientation. Southern area African Diary off Therapy, twenty seven, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, An effective. (1992). Child’s intercourse authored perceptions out-of physical exercise: Outcomes and you will ramifications. Perceptual and Motor Experience, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., M. (1981). The fresh new Nowicki-Strickland Life time Locus regarding Control Bills: Construct recognition. Inside the H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Search on the locus out-of manage create (Vol. dos, pp. 16-43). Ny: Educational Drive.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you will non-stereotypic intercourse role feature and you will choices orientations, sex term and you will psychological modifications. Record out-of Identification and you may Social Mindset, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Chefs, L. (1995). Intercourse and stamina. Within the P. M. Kalbfleisch M. J. Cody (Eds.), Intercourse, fuel, and correspondence for the people matchmaking (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Shaver, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Measures from personality and social emotional perceptions. San diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Rose, Good., Montemayor, Roentgen. (1994). The relationship anywhere between sex character direction and you may understood care about-proficiency when you look at the men and women teens. Sex Opportunities, 29, 579-595.
Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). An enthusiastic Australian gender-part size: Even more psychometric research and correlations having care about-admiration. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Yards. (1991). Aggression, gender character tips and you may Kohut’s mindset of thinking. Intercourse Opportunities, twenty five, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology just like the a purpose of intimate positioning, sex, belief, and you will trait classes from inside the long term dyadic matchmaking. Record from Identity and you can Personal Psychology, 47, 983-1002.
Purchase unmarried blog post
Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, M., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you will attachment defense: One or two relevant types of max character. Personality and you can Societal Therapy Bulletin, twenty-two, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and profitable type along the life span certainly one of Japanese adults. Diary away from Hereditary Mindset, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Elizabeth. (1995). Gender part direction and its relationship to the introduction of term and ethical imagine. Scandinavian Log off Therapy, 36, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and you can gender-associated qualities: An abstract study and you can complaints from latest lookup. Improvements in Experimental Identity Research, thirteen, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). Three decades from gender research: A personal chronicle. Inside the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you may stereotypes within the society: The new sex research away from erican Psychological Connection.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Important and you can expressive characteristics, characteristic stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do it signify? Therapy of women Every quarter, twenty four, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Holahan, C. (1979). Negative and positive areas of emotional masculinity and femininity in addition to their link to thinking-profile out of neurotic and you can acting out routines. Diary out-of Character and Public Therapy, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The private Qualities Questionnaire: A way of measuring gender role stereotypes and you can manliness-womanliness. JSAS List out of Picked Files in Mindset, 4, 43-44.
Risk, J. (1997). Partnering expressiveness and instrumentality within the real life options: An alternate perspective on benefits associated with androgyny. Intercourse Opportunities, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, Meters., Hallway, J. (1982). Psychological androgyny: An evaluation and you will reformulation of your own concepts, steps, and you will findings. Emotional Bulletin, 92, 347-366.
Western, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Undertaking intercourse. In the Yards. Kimmel (Ed.), The brand new gendered neighborhood viewer (pp. 131-149). Nyc: Oxford College Force.
Whitley, B. (1983). Gender part orientation and notice-esteem: A significant meta-analytic review, Diary from Identity and you may Societal Mindset, 44, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (in drive). Prominent and undesirable androgyny: A drug toward twenty-very first century. Journal of Intercourse Degree.
Wulff, Yards., Steitz, J. (1999). A path brand of the connection anywhere between profession indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you may notice-value. Perceptual and you may System Knowledge, 88, 935-940.